Jfah. MCCLATCHY
Posted on Thursday, July 25, 2013
|0 share Plf^Tl email | print
) ustice Department to take on states over voting rights
Attorney General Eric Holder speaks at the National Urban League annual conference in Philadelphia | Matt Rourke/AP
By Anita Kumar | McClatchy Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration announced Thursday that it will legally contest a series of laws around the country as part of an aggressive campaign to fight a recent Supreme Court ruling that it says could reduce minority voting.
The Justice Department filed its first challenge Thursday, asking a judge to require Texas to seek permission from the
2
P
Graphic | State voter ID laws Graphic | Supreme Court strikes down key part of Voting Rights Act
State voter ID laws
Pennsylvania is one of 30 states that have laws currently in effect requiring voters to present identification at the polls before being allowed to cast a ballot.
m Photo ID only Photo* Non photo* No voter ID law
" M ay i no i utfe other options, such as atfidavil
View larger image
i j Mass.
□ Conn,
□ R.l.
□ NJ,
□ Del. Md.
□ D.C.
©2012 MCT
Source; U.S. National Conference of Stele Legislatures Grepnic; Los- Angeles Times
federal government before making voting changes because of the state's history of discrimination. Several states in the South and Southwest could face similar lawsuits, including North Carolina and South Carolina.
"This is the department's first action to protect voting rights following the (Supreme Court) . . . decision, but it will not be our last," Attorney General Eric
i Most Viewed
i World
i National
i Washington
i Politics
MOST VIEWED LAST 24 HOURS
With little argument, House limits U.S. military involvement in Syria, Egypt
Yemeni president pardons reporter Obama wanted kept in jail
Arrests in attacks on Hezbollah suggest Lebanon closing in on Syrian rebel group
Justice Department to take on states over voting rights
Poll: Back off the snooping, public tells Washington
RECENT WORLD HEADLINES
Arrests in attacks on Hezbollah suggest Lebanon closing in on Syrian rebel group
Despite EU terror designation, Hezbollah will be in Lebanon's next government, Nasrallah says
U.S. delays F-16s for Egypt as el-Sissi calls for protests against 'terrorism'
Yemeni president pardons reporter Obama wanted kept in jail
In Afghan national park, the rare sound of women laughing
» More World headlines
RECENT NATIONAL HEADLINES
BBC America's 'Copper' has a special guest: Alfre Woodard
New Capitol Hill group looks for ways to avoid the next Trayvon Martin
Researchers make a beeline to learn what's harming hives
Poll: Back off the snooping, public tells Washington
Study: Men more likely to be granted flexible work schedules
» More Nation headlines
RECENT WASHINGTON HEADLINES
New Capitol Hill group looks for ways to avoid the next Trayvon Martin
Poll: Back off the snooping, public tells Washington
MIT interactive videos get high school students thinking like scientists
Joint Chiefs Chairman Dempsey offers bleak view of U.S. military options in Syria
Cattle producers want to get rid of new meat labels
» More Washington headlines
RECENT POLITICS HEADLINES
Mad dash lands Sanford on House floor in running shorts
Justice Department to take on states over voting rights
Rep. Mulvaney gets win in U.S. House on defense cuts
Poll: Public wants immigration, voting rights fixed, but differs on solutions
Holder told a National Urban League conference in Philadelphia on Thursday. "My colleagues and I are determined to use every tool at our disposal to stand against discrimination wherever it is found."
Civil rights groups and African-American lawmakers welcomed the decision, as did the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
They had urged President Barack Obama to wade into the issue after a divided Supreme Court struck down a centerpiece of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that required some states to receive federal approval for electoral revisions. Some supporters said they were surprised at how quickly the administration intervened.
"I think it's a great move," said Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, chairwoman of the 42-member Congressional Black Caucus. "I think the Civil Rights Division and the Justice Department in general should make sure that the citizens of this country have fair and equal treatment."
But Texas officials, from Austin to Washington, blasted the decision, accusing the Obama administration of "bullying" the state for political reasons.
"Once again, the Obama administration is demonstrating utter contempt for our country's system of checks and balances, not to mention the U.S. Constitution," Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement. "This end-run around the Supreme Court undermines the will of the people of Texas, and casts unfair aspersions on our state's common-sense efforts to preserve the integrity of our elections process."
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott accused Obama officials of "political theater" and intervening in the case solely to help Democratic candidates and hurt five Hispanic Republicans in the 2014 Texas elections for legislature and Congress.
One voter rights group, True the Vote, immediately announced plans to fight Holder in court.
"We will meet Attorney General Holder in court and we will do whatever we need to do to advance the cause of voters' rights for all Americans," said the group's president, Catherine Engelbrecht.
Fifty-three percent of Americans believe discrimination in voting remains a problem and should be addressed by Congress, while 37 percent do not, according to a McClatchy-Marist poll released Thursday. But only 28 percent say it should be an immediate priority for Obama and Congress.
Obamacare enrollment efforts, and message wars, heat up
» More Politics headlines
Register | Log in Logout | Member Center
TODAY'S FEATURED CARTOON
» More cartoons
POLITICS & GOVERNMENT BLOG
Planet Washington
"Planet Washington" is a group blog by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.
The Supreme Court ruling in June prompted some states to immediately try to enact or enforce more restrictions on voting, including requiring additional identification to vote.
The Republican-led legislature in Texas passed a so-called voter ID law as well as a new map for congressional and legislative districts that a coalition of Democratic legislators and civil rights groups is opposing in court. Holder will join that case. No matter how the court rules, the case likely will be appealed to the Supreme Court.
Holder said Thursday that other provisions in the Voting Rights Act not impacted by the Supreme Court decision allow him to ask courts to provide a judge or the Justice Department with the authority to review changes in state voting laws.
The Voting Rights Act has always permitted such a maneuver, but the strategy rarely has been used, according to voting rights experts.
Guy-Uriel Charles, director of the Duke Law Center on Law, Race and Politics at Duke University, said the Justice Department's actions do not constitute an "end run" around the Supreme Court. But he said it will be difficult to win because the government must prove discrimination in laws that supporters say were enacted to prevent fraud.
"It may be the only move they have left," he said, referring to the administration.
Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, designated states and jurisdictions must secure federal approval before they change any voting practice or procedure. This can cover everything from buying new voting machines to closing polling places.
A related provision of the law, Section 4, provides the formula for determining which political jurisdictions must meet the preclearance requirements. The justices struck down this section as unconstitutional.
Nine states are covered by the requirements: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. Selected jurisdictions in an additional seven states also are covered, including parts of California, Florida, North Carolina, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York and South Dakota.
Holder said he has shifted resources to help enforce voting laws not affected by the Supreme Court's decision. But he said he still wants Congress to restore, and even strengthen, voting protections.
"Let me be very clear: These remaining tools are no substitute for legislation that must fill the void left by the Supreme Court's decision," he said. "This issue transcends partisanship, and we must work together. We cannot allow the slow unraveling of the progress that so many, throughout history, have sacrificed so much to achieve."
But a fix on Capitol Hill is a nearly impossible task for an increasingly divided, gridlocked Congress.
Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, is hopeful Congress will pass a remedy by the end of the year. But he still believes Holder should act.
"Wherever the attorney general can find flagrant violations of the Voting Rights Act or 14th and 15th Amendments, he needs to bring lawsuits," said Butterfield, a former North Carolina judge.
William Douglas and David Lightman of the Washington Bureau contributed to this report.
Email: akumar@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @anitakumar01
Order a reprint of this story |Q shrre P»B.,.j email | print |
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.
Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy About our Ads Copyright McClatchy Washington Bureau McClatchy Newspapers About McClatchy Correspondents Contact the Bureau